Exactly. The path to become president of the United States is almost clear for Hillary Clinton. I don't know historical facts but I guess this is the first time in the history of United States when two poor people are contesting for presidential election. Poor in terms of what everybody knows.
She is damn lucky I think,she is running against him, because she is an empty pantsuit with no vision for the future except for her own ambition. A recent survey has revealed that 60% of voters don't like neither Trump nor Clinton. Both of them are trying to persuade remaining 40% voters.
For better and mostly worse, Bernie Sanders and Trump have at least laid out bold,sweeping platforms that would radically change the status quo at a time when almost two third of voters believe the country is headed in wrong direction.Clinton has simply indulged in lame me--tooism and strategic vagueness.
The goopy melange of positions may be enough to win in an election where Donald Trump is her main challenger, but it shouldn't be confused with anything approaching leadership, statesmanship or vision. No wonder her supporters are quick to judge her not on the quality of her ideas but on the content of her resume.
There is no meaning of talking about Trump and his rhetoric statements and illogically and irrationally radicalized ideology. If he becomes president it would be the most unfortunate situation in the history of the world.
Coming to Hillary, I visualize her as a car, brand new, full of latest technologies and accessories but it can not move. Because it doesn't have an Engine.
She is damn lucky I think,she is running against him, because she is an empty pantsuit with no vision for the future except for her own ambition. A recent survey has revealed that 60% of voters don't like neither Trump nor Clinton. Both of them are trying to persuade remaining 40% voters.
For better and mostly worse, Bernie Sanders and Trump have at least laid out bold,sweeping platforms that would radically change the status quo at a time when almost two third of voters believe the country is headed in wrong direction.Clinton has simply indulged in lame me--tooism and strategic vagueness.
The goopy melange of positions may be enough to win in an election where Donald Trump is her main challenger, but it shouldn't be confused with anything approaching leadership, statesmanship or vision. No wonder her supporters are quick to judge her not on the quality of her ideas but on the content of her resume.
There is no meaning of talking about Trump and his rhetoric statements and illogically and irrationally radicalized ideology. If he becomes president it would be the most unfortunate situation in the history of the world.
Coming to Hillary, I visualize her as a car, brand new, full of latest technologies and accessories but it can not move. Because it doesn't have an Engine.
No comments:
Post a Comment